CEOs Are Bullish on 2010

October 8, 2009

80% of Respondents Expect Bonuses Next Year vs. Only 45% for 2009

Is optimism returning among corporate leaders?  Better times are coming, according to a recent poll of chief executives.   Expectations for 2010 compensation reflect an upbeat outlook on business performance and resultant pay packages.

Executive salary and bonus plans remain a hot topic if the response to ExpertCEO’s Fall CEO Salary Survey is any indication, with more than 150 members participating.  Poll highlights include the following observations:

  • CEOs are upbeat about overall 2010 pay prospects (and, implicitly, operating results), anticipating a bounce of nearly 7% in 2010 total compensation vs. 2009 levels, to an average of $340,000.
  • About 80% of members expect to receive a 2010 bonus; the average expected amount is $105,000, up from $92,000 in 2009 and $100,000 in 2008.
  • Pressure on bonuses reduced average anticipated 2009 take-home pay from 2008 levels for the CEOs surveyed; 55% of respondents expect to receive NO bonus.
  • Though average 2009 salaries are roughly flat with 2008 (about $228,000), total compensation is estimated to drop to $319,000 from $332,000 in 2008.
  • Technology and Media/Internet CEOs, 67% of the survey population, expect total compensation of $306,000 in 2009 with a projected 8% increase to $331,000 in 2010.
  • CEOs who head companies with revenues under $1MM have compensation packages heavily weighted towards equity, rather than cash, as anticipated.  70% of these individuals expect no bonus in 2009; their average equity ownership is 40%, compared with the median ownership of 8% for the entire survey population.
  • Trends from the Feb ’09 ExpertCEO survey held steady.  The larger a company’s revenue base, the larger the CEO’s salary and bonus–and the more likely he or she will receive a bonus.  CEOs who manage companies with more than $50 million in revenue reported average salaries of $313,000, compared with $162,000 cited by CEOs heading firms with less than $1MM in sales.

Rule # 30 – Negotiation Posture is Determined by the Next Best Alternative

October 1, 2009

Liquidity events represent the final outcome in the entrepreneurial journey, and they are few and far between.  In today’s financial climate, IPOs are highly unusual, and the most likely path to liquidity is via an acquisition.  The acquisition process is complex and highly stressful, even if you’re one of the fortunate few companies where multiple organizations are competing to acquire you.  The process of negotiating this type of a transaction, with all of its intricacies, is time consuming and complex, especially on the CEO.  Some CEOs are natural negotiators, and some aren’t.  In any case, the “art” or “skill” of negotiation is important whether you’re negotiating the acquisition of your company, a big product sale or your own salary.

For some sound, timeless advice, I again return to George Von Gehr’s new book, “The Effective Entrepreneur: Fifty-nine rules to Create Value Throughout the Life Cycle of Your Company” (Amazon Link) and, with permission, reprint here Rule 30.  Here’s George’s background in a previous post.

George has a series of five rules on the topic of negotiation, so I thought I’d offer them on this blog over the next few weeks.

“Whether hiring personnel or selling the company, your negotiating strength and position are determined by the nature of your next best alternative.  In a sense, this establishes your minimum or maximum values for that negotiation.  What is important from a company management point of view, is to establish  a satisfactory backup alternative and then to understand its worth in the context of the negotiation.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, negotiation is not necessarily a zero sum process.  Knowing what things are most important to each party is a critical part of the artistry.  Negotiators often seem to want everything — even things of little value to them — just to demonstrate their macho strength.  Therefore making “trades” is an essential part of the process, permitting both sides to receive suitable value and to feel positive about the outcome.

For a negotiation to be effective, conferring in advance with your board and /or with internal management is necessary in ordre to gain their support for the outcome.  A carefully constructed negotiating strategy also allows a measure of victory for the other party so there will be support for the deal on the other side as well”.

Knowing when to hold ‘em and when to fold ‘em can make the difference between a good outcome and a bad exchange.  And having another alternative, so you that you’re not forced to accept a deal, is critical to your negotiation strategy.  Your alternative may be to “do nothing” and run the company profitably or it may be to raise more capital to make the company a success on its own.  So take time BEFORE you sit down to negotiate to listen, learn and confirm—objectives of your own team, as well as the primary goals of your counterpart.  Understand your alternatives.  Getting to yes requires a keen understanding of what yes entails, and the patience and creativity to assemble a package that resembles closely enough that which will satisfy the many players whose assent is essential.